Monty's Bone Pile crest Monty's Bone Pile School of Peptide Studies
PEP 101 · Module 05

Reconstitution and Dose Math

The central module of the foundations track. A vial of powder, a volume of liquid, and one division problem that determines everything after it. Worked slowly, because this is where the field's most consequential errors are made.

Why the vial contains powder

Peptides in solution degrade. Water is the medium in which hydrolysis, oxidation, aggregation, and microbial growth all proceed, and a dissolved peptide sitting in a warehouse for six months is a peptide that has partly stopped being that peptide. So it is lyophilised: frozen and then dried under vacuum, so the ice sublimates directly to vapour and leaves a dry cake behind. Dry, the molecule is stable for a long time. Add water and the clock starts.

That is the entire reason reconstitution exists as a step, and it is also why Module 06 on storage follows immediately.

The diluent

Two liquids are commonly used and they are not the same.

DiluentContainsConsequence
Bacteriostatic waterWater with 0.9% benzyl alcoholInhibits bacterial growth. Supports repeated withdrawals from the same vial over a period of weeks.
Sterile water for injectionWater, no preservativeSterile at the moment of opening, with nothing to keep it that way. Intended for single use.

The distinction is not fussiness. Benzyl alcohol is a preservative; it is what makes a multi-dose vial a multi-dose vial. Reconstituting with plain sterile water and then drawing from that vial for a month means every withdrawal after the first is from an unpreserved container that has been punctured repeatedly.

Benzyl alcohol is also not universally appropriate. It is contraindicated in neonates, and a small number of people react to it. Some manufacturers specify a particular diluent for a particular compound. Where a specification exists, it wins over any general rule, including this one.

The calculation

Everything rests on one line, which you already met in Module 04.

The whole of it
Concentration = vial mass ÷ diluent volume
5 mg into 2 mL gives 2.5 mg/mL.
Volume to draw = dose ÷ concentration
250 mcg from a 2,500 mcg/mL solution is 0.1 mL.
Units on a U-100 barrel = volume in mL × 100
0.1 mL is 10 units.

Compressed into a single expression, which is worth writing on the inside of a cupboard door:

units = (dose in mcg × diluent in mL × 100) ÷ (vial strength in mcg)

And its companion, which is often the more useful of the two because it lets you sanity-check a draw instantly:

Micrograms per unit
mcg per unit = vial strength in mcg ÷ (diluent in mL × 100)
A 5 mg vial in 2 mL: 5,000 ÷ 200 = 25 mcg per unit. Once you know that number, every dose is a one-step division.

Worked example A: the standard case

You have: a 5 mg vial. You add: 2 mL of bacteriostatic water. You want: a 250 mcg dose.

  1. Convert the vial to micrograms. 5 mg = 5,000 mcg.
  2. Concentration: 5,000 mcg ÷ 2 mL = 2,500 mcg/mL.
  3. Micrograms per unit: 2,500 ÷ 100 = 25 mcg per unit.
  4. Units for a 250 mcg dose: 250 ÷ 25 = 10 units.
  5. Sanity check: 10 units is 0.1 mL. The vial holds 2 mL. That is 20 doses.

Step five is not optional. If the arithmetic says a vial contains three doses when the protocol implies thirty, something has gone wrong upstream, and you have just caught it before it mattered.

Worked example B: when the answer is unusable

You have: a 10 mg vial. You add: 1 mL. You want: 250 mcg.

  1. 10 mg = 10,000 mcg.
  2. Concentration: 10,000 ÷ 1 = 10,000 mcg/mL.
  3. Micrograms per unit: 10,000 ÷ 100 = 100 mcg per unit.
  4. Units for 250 mcg: 250 ÷ 100 = 2.5 units.

The arithmetic is correct and the result is bad. Two and a half units on a 1 mL barrel graduated every two units is not a measurement; it is a guess with a 20-40% error bar on a dose. The problem is not the maths. It is that the diluent volume was chosen without asking what the doses would look like.

Redo it with 4 mL:

  1. Concentration: 10,000 ÷ 4 = 2,500 mcg/mL.
  2. Micrograms per unit: 25.
  3. Units for 250 mcg: 10 units, on a mark you can see, on a barrel graduated finely enough to read it.
The rule this teaches

Choose the diluent volume after deciding the dose, not before. Work backwards from the mark you want to draw to. The correct diluent volume is whichever one makes your intended dose land on a whole, readable graduation, ideally somewhere between 5 and 40 units, where a barrel reads cleanly.

Worked example C: reading it the other direction

Someone hands you a reconstituted vial and tells you it was 2 mg in 1 mL. You want to know what 8 units delivers.

  1. 2 mg = 2,000 mcg; in 1 mL that is 2,000 mcg/mL.
  2. Per unit: 2,000 ÷ 100 = 20 mcg per unit.
  3. 8 units × 20 = 160 mcg.

Being able to run the calculation in both directions is the actual competence. One direction plans a dose; the other audits one.

Worked example D: the high-strength vial

Examples A to C use the 2 to 10 mg vials typical of most research peptides. The metabolic compounds are sold at much higher strengths, often in larger vials, and the arithmetic does not change at all. It is worth working one so the numbers stop looking unfamiliar.

You have: a 60 mg vial. You add: 3 mL. You want: a 10 mg dose.

  1. Concentration: 60 mg ÷ 3 mL = 20 mg/mL.
  2. Volume to draw: 10 mg ÷ 20 mg/mL = 0.5 mL.
  3. Units on a U-100 barrel: 0.5 × 100 = 50 units.
  4. Sanity check: the vial holds 3 mL and each dose is 0.5 mL, so 6 doses. At weekly dosing that is roughly six weeks, which is longer than the in-use window discussed in Module 06. Worth knowing before you reconstitute the whole vial.

Note that step five caught something the first four steps did not: the arithmetic is fine and the plan is still wrong, because the vial outlives its own shelf life. This is the general case for the sanity check. It is not there to verify the division. It is there to ask whether the answer makes sense in the world.

A note on how these are sold

High-strength peptides are commonly supplied as a "kit": ten vials, usually 3 mL each, at a stated strength per vial. A kit described as 10 × 30 mg contains 300 mg in total, not 30 mg. Reading that wrong in either direction produces a factor-of-ten error before any reconstitution has happened.

A reference table

Micrograms delivered per single unit on a U-100 barrel, by vial strength and diluent volume.

Vial1 mL2 mL3 mL5 mL
2 mg20 mcg10 mcg6.7 mcg4 mcg
5 mg50 mcg25 mcg16.7 mcg10 mcg
10 mg100 mcg50 mcg33.3 mcg20 mcg
15 mg150 mcg75 mcg50 mcg30 mcg
20 mg200 mcg100 mcg66.7 mcg40 mcg

Use the table to sanity-check the calculator, and use the calculator to check the table. Two independent methods agreeing is how you know an answer, and the reconstitution calculator in the Reference Room exists for exactly that purpose.

The three classic errors

One: the factor of a thousand

Vial labelled in mg, protocol written in mcg, no conversion performed. Off by 1,000×. Defence: convert everything to micrograms before touching a calculator, and always run the sanity check in step five above. A vial that suddenly contains twenty thousand doses or one fifth of a dose is telling you loudly that a decimal moved.

Two: treating the barrel mark as a dose

Reading "250 mcg" and drawing to the 25 mark, because 25 is the closest thing on the barrel to 250. The mark is a volume. It has no idea what is dissolved in it. Defence: never draw to a number until you have written down the mcg-per-unit figure for that specific vial.

Three: the wrong barrel

Using a U-40 syringe with U-100 arithmetic, delivering 2.5× the intended volume every time. Defence: read the calibration printed on the barrel before the first draw from every new box.

A fourth, less discussed

Dead space. Every syringe and needle retains a small volume that is never delivered, typically a few hundredths of a millilitre in an insulin syringe with a fixed needle, more in a detachable-needle setup. It is negligible against a 20-unit draw and proportionally significant against a 3-unit one. It is another argument for diluting to a volume where your doses are not tiny.

The physical procedure

The arithmetic is only useful if the vial survives the process.

  1. Let the vial reach room temperature. Adding liquid to cold glass is unnecessary thermal stress and encourages condensation.
  2. Swab both septa. Alcohol on the peptide vial's rubber stopper and on the diluent vial's, and let them dry. Wet alcohol is not disinfected alcohol.
  3. Draw the diluent to the volume you calculated, the one you chose deliberately, not the one that was easiest.
  4. Angle the needle so the stream runs down the inside wall of the vial. This is the step people skip. Firing a jet of water directly into the lyophilised cake shears the molecule and denatures a fraction of it. Slow, down the side.
  5. Do not shake. Shaking foams the solution, and the air-liquid interface is where peptides aggregate. Swirl gently or roll the vial between your palms.
  6. Wait. Most cakes dissolve within a minute or two, some take longer. If it has not dissolved, give it time at room temperature rather than agitation.
  7. Look at it. Clear and free of particulates is what you want. Cloudiness that does not clear, visible floaters, or discolouration mean something is wrong. Discard.
  8. Label the vial with the concentration and the date it was reconstituted. Not the dose, the concentration. A vial with "25 mcg/unit · 4 Aug" written on it cannot be misread three weeks later.

Step eight is the cheapest safety intervention in the entire field and almost nobody does it.

What you should be able to do now

  • Calculate concentration, mcg-per-unit, and units-to-draw for any vial and diluent combination.
  • Run the calculation backwards to audit a draw someone else set up.
  • Choose a diluent volume by working backwards from a readable barrel mark.
  • Name the three classic errors and state the defence against each.
  • Reconstitute a vial without shearing, foaming, or contaminating it.

Module 06 covers what happens to that vial over the following four weeks.